31 9 2007 9
HIGH
ENERGY
PHYSICS
AND
NUCLEAR
PHYSICS
Vol.31,No.9
Sep.,2007
UnderstandingtheInteractionbetweenDarkEnergy
andDarkMatter*
WANGBin1)
(DepartmentofPhysics,FudanUniversity,Shanghai200433,China)
AbstractWehavestudiedtheinteractionbetweendarkenergyanddarkmatterfromthethermodynamicalconsideration.Assumingtheinteractionasstablefluctuationsaroundequilibriumandusingthelogarithmiccorrectiontoentropycausedbythefluctuation,wehavederivedthephysicalexpressionoftheinteraction.Wehavetestedtheviabilityofourscenarioontheinteactionbyconfrontingwithcosmologicalobservations.
Keywordsdarkenergy,darkmatter,interaction
Avarietyofcosmologicalobservationssuggestaconcordantcompellingresultthatouruniverseisun-dergoinganacceleratedexpansiondrivenbydarken-ergy(DE).Despitetherobustobservationalevi-dence,thetheoreticalnatureandtheoriginofdarkenergyarestillthesourceofmuchdebate.Darkenergyisamajorpuzzleofthemoderncosmologywhichwasattractedalotofeffortstounderstanditinthepastyears.TheleadinginterpretationofsuchaDEisacosmologicalconstantwithequationofstate(EOS)wD=−1.AlthoughthecosmologicalconstantisthesimplesttheoreticalsolutiontoDEandisen-tirelyconsistentwiththecurrentobservationalcon-straints,thewell-knowncosmologicalconstantprob-lemconcerningwhythevacuumenergyissomuchsmallerthanthevaluefromtheeffectivefieldtheoryremainsunsolved.Thereareotherconjecturesrelat-ingtheDEtoascalarfieldcalledQuintessencewithwD>−1,ortoanexoticfieldcalledPhantomwithwD
[3][2]
[1]
analysesmildlyfavortheevolutionoftheDEparam-eterwDfromwD>−1towD
[2]
andthephantomsufferseven
moretheoreticalproblems[4].Besidesthesemodels,recently,anewDEmodelstimulatedbytheholo-graphicprinciplehasbeenputforward
[5]
anditwas
[6]
foundconsistentwiththeobservationaldata.MostdiscussionsonDErelyontheassumptionthatitsevolutionisindependentofothermatterfields.Onemightarguethatgiventheunknownna-tureofbothDEanddarkmatter(DM),anentirelyindependentbehaviorofDEandDMisveryspe-cial.StudiesontheinteractionbetweenDEandDMhavebeencarriedoutin
[7—12]
.Ithasbeenshown
thatthecouplingbetweenthequintessencefieldandDMcanprovideamechanismtogenerateaccelera-tionandalleviatethecoincidenceproblem
[7,12]
.In-
vestigationsonthesuitablecouplingbetweenholo-graphicDEandDMhavepresentedatheoreticalex-planationontheobservationaltransitionoftheDEEOSfromwD>−1towD
9 875
ΩDH),where
ΩD=ρD/(3H2).Takingderivativewithrespecttothescalefactoronbothsidesoftheeventhorizonexpression,wehave
H
ΩD
2ΩD
x=lna.
UsingtheFriedmannequationΩD+Ωm=1and
ΩD10
(1)—(3),wecanobtaintheEOSwD=−
.
(3)
wheretheprimeisthederivativewithrespectto
876 (HEP&NP) 31
2
Ω+
(4)
D
Ω .D
WiththesepreparationswecanexaminehowmuchtheeventhorizonwillchangeoveroneHubbletime,
tR
˙EH
D
ΩD
2−
Ω
2
ln(CT2),whereCistheheatcapacity
[19]
.
Inourcase,theheatcapacityoftheDEcanbecal-culatedasC=
1∂T
=−(2πRE)2πc2(1+3w0)R2
DE,whichispositivesinceforDE1+3w0
D
readsS1=−
1
2ln
2πc
dS1
ΩD
c2πRE
万方数据
8πQ
H
ΩD+3(1+wD)ΩD=−
Ωm+3Ω8πQ
H
m=
ΩD
3H3Ω.(14)
D
ComparingwithEq.(9),wecanobtaintheinterac-
tiontermQintheform
−8πQ
dS1
πc2RE
dS1
3πc2RE
ΩD)andusingEq.(8),wehavedS1
ΩD/c−1)
HΩ D
ΩD−1
−
Ω.
DBesides,usingtheFriedmannequation−1)
(16)
and(3),
9 877
Ω+(ΩDD−1)+2√c
(ΩD−1)=−
8πQ
1√H2Ω2
Ω−
c
+
D
D
ΩD
ΩD
πc4
.(18)
WithEqs.(18)and(3)athand,weareinaposi-tiontodiscussthedependenceoftheevolutionofDEwithrespecttothecouplingtoDM.Inthenumericalcalculation,wesetc=1.FromFig.1welearnthatwiththeinteractionbetweenDEandDM,DEstartstobeeffectiveearlier.Withtheinteraction,DEandDMfolloweachother,asdisplayedinFig.2.WeseefromFig.2(a)and2(b)thatwiththeinteraction,ρm=ρDearlierthanthecasewithoutinteraction.Toobservemoreclearly,wecandefinetheratiobe-tweenenergydensitiesr=ρm/ρ[7]
D
andinvestigateits
changewiththescalefactor.ThebehaviorisshowninFig.2(c).risamonotonousdecreasingfunctionofthescalefactor,andaroundthepresenttimeitvariesveryslowly.Comparedwiththenoninteractingcase,wefindintherecenterathemonotonousdecreaseofrisslowerwhenthereisaninteractionbetweenDEandDM.ThismeansthatintherecenthistoryoftheuniverseDEisbeingtransformedintoDMduetotheircoupling.Thisresultgotbyemployingthederivedinteractionfromentropycorrectionisconsis-tentwiththeearlierresultinthephenomenologicalinteractionmodel
[10]
andinthestudyoftheinter-actingquintessencemodel[7]
.ThedifferentevolutionoftheDMduetoitsinteractionwithDEgivesrisetothedifferentexpansionhistoryoftheuniverseanddifferentevolutionofthematterdensityperturbationwhichmodifiesthestructureformation.InRef.[8,10]thematterdensityperturbationsintheinteractingmodelshavebeeninvestigatedandinRef.[10]theinfluencetotheDMdensityperturbationduetotheinteractionbetweenDEandDMhasbeenusedtoexplainwhyitispossible,asrecentlyobserved,foranoldquasartobeobservedintheearlystagesoftheuniverse.Asacomparison,inFig.1and2wehavealsoincludedtheresultbyconsideringthephe-
万方数据
nomenologicalinteractionbetweenDEandDMwith
constantcouplingb.ItiseasytoseethattheresultontheevolutionofDEandDMbyusingthephe-nomenologicalmodelisconsistentwiththeresultgot
byusingtheinteractionderivedfromthethermody-namicalconsideration.
Fig.1.EvolutionsofΩDandΩmwithandwithoutinteraction.Linesshowingvaluesin-creasingwithaareΩD,andthedecreasinglinesareforΩm.Thesolidlineistheresultofourmodel,thedottedlineistheresultwithoutinteractionandthedashedlineisforthesim-plephenomenologicalmodelwithb2=0.06.
Fig.2.EvolutionsofρDandρmwithandwith-outinteraction.Beforethecrossingpoint,linesontheleftareforρD,otherbunchesoflinesareforρm.Thesolidlineistheresultofourmodel,thedottedlineistheresultwithoutinteractionandthedashedlineisforthesim-plephenomenologicalmodelwithb2=0.06.
IncludingtheinteractionbetweenDEandDMwiththeformderivedfromentropycorrection,ourmodelnaturallyshowsthatouruniversehasanac-celeratedexpansioninthelatestageandontheotherhanditalsodisplaysadecelerationintheearlytime.InFig.3,weshowthedependenceofthedecelera-tionparameteronthecouplingbetweenDEandDM.Thisresultisalsosimilartothatgotbyusingthephenomenologicalinteraction[9]
.
WenowdiscusstheEOSofDEwiththeinterac-tionbetweenDEandDM.Wefoundthatwithourderivedinteractionform,theDEnaturallyhasatran-sitionasindicatedbyrecentobservationswithwDcrossingtheborder−1.Thisresultispresentedin
878 (HEP&NP) 31
dS1
3πc2RE
9 879
References
1RiessAGetal.Astron.J.,1998,116:1009;PerlmutterSetal.Astrophys.J.,1999,517:565;PerlmutterSetal.As-trophys.J.,2003,598:102;deBernardisPetal.Nature,2000,404:955
2PadmanabhanT.Phys.Rept.,2003,380:235.hep-th/0212290;PeeblesPJE,RatraB.Rev.Mod.Phys.,2003,75:559.astro-ph/0207347;SahniV.astro-ph/04033243AlamU,SahniV,StarobinskyAA.JCAP,2004,0406:008;HutererD,CoorayA.Phys.Rev.,2005,D71:023506;WANGY,TegmarkM.astro-ph/0501351;JassalHK,BaglaJS,PadmanabhanT.astro-ph/0506748
4CarrollSM,HoffmanM,TroddenM.Phys.Rev.,2003,D68:023509;ClineJM,JeonSY,MooreGD.Phys.Rev.,2004,D70:043543;HsuSDH,JenkinsA,WiseMB.Phys.Lett.,2004,B597:2705LIM.Phys.Lett.,2004,B603:1
6HUANGQG,GONGYG.JCAP,2004,0408:006;GONGYG,WANGB,ZHANGYZ.Phys.Rev.,2005,D72:043510;ZHANGX.astro-ph/0504586;SHENJY,WANGB,AbdallaEetal.Phys.Lett.,2005,B609:200;HUANGZY,WANGB,AbdallaEetal.JCAP,2006,0605:013;ElizaldeE,NojiriS,OdintsovSDetal.hep-th/0502082;WANGBin,GONGYun-Gui,SURu-Keng.Phys.Lett.,2005,B605:9—14;WANGBin,ElcioAb-dalla,SURu-Keng.Phys.Lett.,2005,B611:21—267SergiodelCampo,RamonHerrera,GermanOlivares,DiegoPavon.Phys.Rev.,2006,D74:023501;Sergiodelcampo,RamonHerrera,DiegoPavon.Phys.Rev.,2005,D71:123529;DiegoPavon,WinfriedZimdahl.Phys.Lett.,2005,B628:206—210;GermanOlivares,FernandoAtrio-Barandela,DiegoPavon.Phys.Rev.,2005,D71:0635238OlivaresG,Atrio-BarandelaF,PavonD.Phys.Rev.,2006,
D74:043521
9WANGBin,GONGYun-Gui,ElcioAbdalla.Phys.Lett.,2005,B624:141—146;WANGBin,LINChi-Yong,ElcioAbdalla.Phys.Lett.,2006,B637:357—361
10WANGBin,ZANGJia-Dong,LINChi-Yongetal.astro-ph/0607126
11SubinoyDas,PierStefanoCorasaniti,JustinKhoury.Phys.
Rev.,2006,D73:083509
12LucaAmendola,ShinjiTsujikawa,SamiM.Phys.Lett.,
2006,B632:155—158;LucaAmendola,ClaudiaQuer-cellini.Phys.Rev.,2003,D68:023514;AndersonGW,CarrollSM.arXiv:astro-ph/971128813BeanR.Phys.Rev.,2001,D64:12351614ZimdanlW.gr-qc/0505056
15PiazzaF,TsujikawaS.JCAP,2004,0407:00416NikodemJ.Poplawski.gr-qc/0608031
17GibbonsGW,HawkingSW.Phys.Rev.,1977,D15:273818RaphaelBousso.Phys.Rev.,2005,D71:064024
19SauryaDas,ParthasarathiMajumdar,RajatK.Bhaduri.
Class.Quant.Grav.,2002,19:2355—2368
20C´ecileBarbachoux,J´eromeGariel,G´erardLeDenmat.
astro-ph/0603299
21CohenA,KaplanD,NelsonA.Phys.Rev.Lett.,1999,82:
4971
22GermanIzquierdo,DiegoPavon.gr-qc/0606014;German
Izquierdo,DiegoPavon.Phys.Lett.,2006,B633:420—426
23FriacaA,AlcanizJS,LimaJAS.Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.
Soc.,2005,362:1295;HasingerG,SchartelN,KomossaS.Astrophys.J.,2002,573:L77;KomossaS,HasingerG.inXEUSstudyingtheevolutionoftheuniverse
24SpergelDNetal.astroph/0603449ApJ;SpergelDNet
al.Astrophys.J.,2003,148(Suppl.):175
*
(
1)
200433)
. , , .
31 9 2007 9
HIGH
ENERGY
PHYSICS
AND
NUCLEAR
PHYSICS
Vol.31,No.9
Sep.,2007
UnderstandingtheInteractionbetweenDarkEnergy
andDarkMatter*
WANGBin1)
(DepartmentofPhysics,FudanUniversity,Shanghai200433,China)
AbstractWehavestudiedtheinteractionbetweendarkenergyanddarkmatterfromthethermodynamicalconsideration.Assumingtheinteractionasstablefluctuationsaroundequilibriumandusingthelogarithmiccorrectiontoentropycausedbythefluctuation,wehavederivedthephysicalexpressionoftheinteraction.Wehavetestedtheviabilityofourscenarioontheinteactionbyconfrontingwithcosmologicalobservations.
Keywordsdarkenergy,darkmatter,interaction
Avarietyofcosmologicalobservationssuggestaconcordantcompellingresultthatouruniverseisun-dergoinganacceleratedexpansiondrivenbydarken-ergy(DE).Despitetherobustobservationalevi-dence,thetheoreticalnatureandtheoriginofdarkenergyarestillthesourceofmuchdebate.Darkenergyisamajorpuzzleofthemoderncosmologywhichwasattractedalotofeffortstounderstanditinthepastyears.TheleadinginterpretationofsuchaDEisacosmologicalconstantwithequationofstate(EOS)wD=−1.AlthoughthecosmologicalconstantisthesimplesttheoreticalsolutiontoDEandisen-tirelyconsistentwiththecurrentobservationalcon-straints,thewell-knowncosmologicalconstantprob-lemconcerningwhythevacuumenergyissomuchsmallerthanthevaluefromtheeffectivefieldtheoryremainsunsolved.Thereareotherconjecturesrelat-ingtheDEtoascalarfieldcalledQuintessencewithwD>−1,ortoanexoticfieldcalledPhantomwithwD
[3][2]
[1]
analysesmildlyfavortheevolutionoftheDEparam-eterwDfromwD>−1towD
[2]
andthephantomsufferseven
moretheoreticalproblems[4].Besidesthesemodels,recently,anewDEmodelstimulatedbytheholo-graphicprinciplehasbeenputforward
[5]
anditwas
[6]
foundconsistentwiththeobservationaldata.MostdiscussionsonDErelyontheassumptionthatitsevolutionisindependentofothermatterfields.Onemightarguethatgiventheunknownna-tureofbothDEanddarkmatter(DM),anentirelyindependentbehaviorofDEandDMisveryspe-cial.StudiesontheinteractionbetweenDEandDMhavebeencarriedoutin
[7—12]
.Ithasbeenshown
thatthecouplingbetweenthequintessencefieldandDMcanprovideamechanismtogenerateaccelera-tionandalleviatethecoincidenceproblem
[7,12]
.In-
vestigationsonthesuitablecouplingbetweenholo-graphicDEandDMhavepresentedatheoreticalex-planationontheobservationaltransitionoftheDEEOSfromwD>−1towD
9 875
ΩDH),where
ΩD=ρD/(3H2).Takingderivativewithrespecttothescalefactoronbothsidesoftheeventhorizonexpression,wehave
H
ΩD
2ΩD
x=lna.
UsingtheFriedmannequationΩD+Ωm=1and
ΩD10
(1)—(3),wecanobtaintheEOSwD=−
.
(3)
wheretheprimeisthederivativewithrespectto
876 (HEP&NP) 31
2
Ω+
(4)
D
Ω .D
WiththesepreparationswecanexaminehowmuchtheeventhorizonwillchangeoveroneHubbletime,
tR
˙EH
D
ΩD
2−
Ω
2
ln(CT2),whereCistheheatcapacity
[19]
.
Inourcase,theheatcapacityoftheDEcanbecal-culatedasC=
1∂T
=−(2πRE)2πc2(1+3w0)R2
DE,whichispositivesinceforDE1+3w0
D
readsS1=−
1
2ln
2πc
dS1
ΩD
c2πRE
万方数据
8πQ
H
ΩD+3(1+wD)ΩD=−
Ωm+3Ω8πQ
H
m=
ΩD
3H3Ω.(14)
D
ComparingwithEq.(9),wecanobtaintheinterac-
tiontermQintheform
−8πQ
dS1
πc2RE
dS1
3πc2RE
ΩD)andusingEq.(8),wehavedS1
ΩD/c−1)
HΩ D
ΩD−1
−
Ω.
DBesides,usingtheFriedmannequation−1)
(16)
and(3),
9 877
Ω+(ΩDD−1)+2√c
(ΩD−1)=−
8πQ
1√H2Ω2
Ω−
c
+
D
D
ΩD
ΩD
πc4
.(18)
WithEqs.(18)and(3)athand,weareinaposi-tiontodiscussthedependenceoftheevolutionofDEwithrespecttothecouplingtoDM.Inthenumericalcalculation,wesetc=1.FromFig.1welearnthatwiththeinteractionbetweenDEandDM,DEstartstobeeffectiveearlier.Withtheinteraction,DEandDMfolloweachother,asdisplayedinFig.2.WeseefromFig.2(a)and2(b)thatwiththeinteraction,ρm=ρDearlierthanthecasewithoutinteraction.Toobservemoreclearly,wecandefinetheratiobe-tweenenergydensitiesr=ρm/ρ[7]
D
andinvestigateits
changewiththescalefactor.ThebehaviorisshowninFig.2(c).risamonotonousdecreasingfunctionofthescalefactor,andaroundthepresenttimeitvariesveryslowly.Comparedwiththenoninteractingcase,wefindintherecenterathemonotonousdecreaseofrisslowerwhenthereisaninteractionbetweenDEandDM.ThismeansthatintherecenthistoryoftheuniverseDEisbeingtransformedintoDMduetotheircoupling.Thisresultgotbyemployingthederivedinteractionfromentropycorrectionisconsis-tentwiththeearlierresultinthephenomenologicalinteractionmodel
[10]
andinthestudyoftheinter-actingquintessencemodel[7]
.ThedifferentevolutionoftheDMduetoitsinteractionwithDEgivesrisetothedifferentexpansionhistoryoftheuniverseanddifferentevolutionofthematterdensityperturbationwhichmodifiesthestructureformation.InRef.[8,10]thematterdensityperturbationsintheinteractingmodelshavebeeninvestigatedandinRef.[10]theinfluencetotheDMdensityperturbationduetotheinteractionbetweenDEandDMhasbeenusedtoexplainwhyitispossible,asrecentlyobserved,foranoldquasartobeobservedintheearlystagesoftheuniverse.Asacomparison,inFig.1and2wehavealsoincludedtheresultbyconsideringthephe-
万方数据
nomenologicalinteractionbetweenDEandDMwith
constantcouplingb.ItiseasytoseethattheresultontheevolutionofDEandDMbyusingthephe-nomenologicalmodelisconsistentwiththeresultgot
byusingtheinteractionderivedfromthethermody-namicalconsideration.
Fig.1.EvolutionsofΩDandΩmwithandwithoutinteraction.Linesshowingvaluesin-creasingwithaareΩD,andthedecreasinglinesareforΩm.Thesolidlineistheresultofourmodel,thedottedlineistheresultwithoutinteractionandthedashedlineisforthesim-plephenomenologicalmodelwithb2=0.06.
Fig.2.EvolutionsofρDandρmwithandwith-outinteraction.Beforethecrossingpoint,linesontheleftareforρD,otherbunchesoflinesareforρm.Thesolidlineistheresultofourmodel,thedottedlineistheresultwithoutinteractionandthedashedlineisforthesim-plephenomenologicalmodelwithb2=0.06.
IncludingtheinteractionbetweenDEandDMwiththeformderivedfromentropycorrection,ourmodelnaturallyshowsthatouruniversehasanac-celeratedexpansioninthelatestageandontheotherhanditalsodisplaysadecelerationintheearlytime.InFig.3,weshowthedependenceofthedecelera-tionparameteronthecouplingbetweenDEandDM.Thisresultisalsosimilartothatgotbyusingthephenomenologicalinteraction[9]
.
WenowdiscusstheEOSofDEwiththeinterac-tionbetweenDEandDM.Wefoundthatwithourderivedinteractionform,theDEnaturallyhasatran-sitionasindicatedbyrecentobservationswithwDcrossingtheborder−1.Thisresultispresentedin
878 (HEP&NP) 31
dS1
3πc2RE
9 879
References
1RiessAGetal.Astron.J.,1998,116:1009;PerlmutterSetal.Astrophys.J.,1999,517:565;PerlmutterSetal.As-trophys.J.,2003,598:102;deBernardisPetal.Nature,2000,404:955
2PadmanabhanT.Phys.Rept.,2003,380:235.hep-th/0212290;PeeblesPJE,RatraB.Rev.Mod.Phys.,2003,75:559.astro-ph/0207347;SahniV.astro-ph/04033243AlamU,SahniV,StarobinskyAA.JCAP,2004,0406:008;HutererD,CoorayA.Phys.Rev.,2005,D71:023506;WANGY,TegmarkM.astro-ph/0501351;JassalHK,BaglaJS,PadmanabhanT.astro-ph/0506748
4CarrollSM,HoffmanM,TroddenM.Phys.Rev.,2003,D68:023509;ClineJM,JeonSY,MooreGD.Phys.Rev.,2004,D70:043543;HsuSDH,JenkinsA,WiseMB.Phys.Lett.,2004,B597:2705LIM.Phys.Lett.,2004,B603:1
6HUANGQG,GONGYG.JCAP,2004,0408:006;GONGYG,WANGB,ZHANGYZ.Phys.Rev.,2005,D72:043510;ZHANGX.astro-ph/0504586;SHENJY,WANGB,AbdallaEetal.Phys.Lett.,2005,B609:200;HUANGZY,WANGB,AbdallaEetal.JCAP,2006,0605:013;ElizaldeE,NojiriS,OdintsovSDetal.hep-th/0502082;WANGBin,GONGYun-Gui,SURu-Keng.Phys.Lett.,2005,B605:9—14;WANGBin,ElcioAb-dalla,SURu-Keng.Phys.Lett.,2005,B611:21—267SergiodelCampo,RamonHerrera,GermanOlivares,DiegoPavon.Phys.Rev.,2006,D74:023501;Sergiodelcampo,RamonHerrera,DiegoPavon.Phys.Rev.,2005,D71:123529;DiegoPavon,WinfriedZimdahl.Phys.Lett.,2005,B628:206—210;GermanOlivares,FernandoAtrio-Barandela,DiegoPavon.Phys.Rev.,2005,D71:0635238OlivaresG,Atrio-BarandelaF,PavonD.Phys.Rev.,2006,
D74:043521
9WANGBin,GONGYun-Gui,ElcioAbdalla.Phys.Lett.,2005,B624:141—146;WANGBin,LINChi-Yong,ElcioAbdalla.Phys.Lett.,2006,B637:357—361
10WANGBin,ZANGJia-Dong,LINChi-Yongetal.astro-ph/0607126
11SubinoyDas,PierStefanoCorasaniti,JustinKhoury.Phys.
Rev.,2006,D73:083509
12LucaAmendola,ShinjiTsujikawa,SamiM.Phys.Lett.,
2006,B632:155—158;LucaAmendola,ClaudiaQuer-cellini.Phys.Rev.,2003,D68:023514;AndersonGW,CarrollSM.arXiv:astro-ph/971128813BeanR.Phys.Rev.,2001,D64:12351614ZimdanlW.gr-qc/0505056
15PiazzaF,TsujikawaS.JCAP,2004,0407:00416NikodemJ.Poplawski.gr-qc/0608031
17GibbonsGW,HawkingSW.Phys.Rev.,1977,D15:273818RaphaelBousso.Phys.Rev.,2005,D71:064024
19SauryaDas,ParthasarathiMajumdar,RajatK.Bhaduri.
Class.Quant.Grav.,2002,19:2355—2368
20C´ecileBarbachoux,J´eromeGariel,G´erardLeDenmat.
astro-ph/0603299
21CohenA,KaplanD,NelsonA.Phys.Rev.Lett.,1999,82:
4971
22GermanIzquierdo,DiegoPavon.gr-qc/0606014;German
Izquierdo,DiegoPavon.Phys.Lett.,2006,B633:420—426
23FriacaA,AlcanizJS,LimaJAS.Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.
Soc.,2005,362:1295;HasingerG,SchartelN,KomossaS.Astrophys.J.,2002,573:L77;KomossaS,HasingerG.inXEUSstudyingtheevolutionoftheuniverse
24SpergelDNetal.astroph/0603449ApJ;SpergelDNet
al.Astrophys.J.,2003,148(Suppl.):175
*
(
1)
200433)
. , , .